|
The social context of a work of art refers to the social conditions of
the time and place that the work was created in and for. During the 1960s
in China, the social conditions of the country were dictated by a social
phenomenon known as the cultural revolution. As a result of this condition
the art was entirely created for the political and social ideology of the
communist party, headed by Chairman Mao Tse Tung. The purpose of this art
was to glorify the proletariat and idealize the Communist doctrine of Chairman
Mao. Roadside Icons
While traveling the roads and highways west of the Mississippi the traveler
will come upon a uniquely american phenomena known as THE RODSIDE ICON.
As three dimensional landmarks they are wittnessed by millions of people
annually and while they are not declared as works of art, to a large degree
they help to shape the publics perception of large scale, landscape sculpture.
(environmental art) (fig. )
Whether it be community identity, tourism, real estate or other,the
commondenominator is to attract and sell. Without respect for environmental,
historic or cultural context; planning, anatomy or aesthetic quality, they
are simply "ploped" in the landscape like inflated lawn ornaments
where they impose and becon like gigantic carnival hawkers. (fig.)
What than is the Historical, Cultural and Social content of the ROADSIDE
ICONS? In the best sense they are immense toys on the landscape evoking
surreal qualities of Salvadore Dali's art. In another way they appear as
fugitive mutant giants escaped from Disneyland, appealing to the child
in all of us. (fig. ) Yet in the worst sense they are reflections of our
culture, mirroring the depth and temperature of our society telling us,
perhaps, more than we want to know about our time, our place and ourselves.
(fig. ) The question here is this; can these things be considered as art,
or kitsch? If so why? If not, why not?
|