REFLECT: Avoid the including
the features in these non-examples
Does it have
the features of these examples?
Avoid including the features in these non-examples: Non-example
1, Non-example 2
How well did you compose your
report?
Avoid including the features in these non-examples
Non-Example #1
Report on Exabition (spelling error)
The first exhibition that I viewed was at the University gallery on
October the ninth at about 2:00. It was a fairly small exhibit with about
fifteen to twenty pieces. Many pieces were interesting but the piece that
I chose I picked merely because I did not particularly understand it. It
was >a painting by Francis Alys done in 1996 with no title and shown
courtesy of ACME in Santa Monica. It was three buildings with curtains
or doors on top of them. It was done with oil and encaustic on canvas but
on the left and right sides of it were two similar works of art by Enrique
Huerta and Emilio Rivera. The other two portrayed the same characteristics
except were done with enamel on sheet metal. The doors on the buildings
were the type of things you could put in like a studio apartment to simulate
a wall but all the doors were facing different directions (this
sentence is unclear). The gray clouds
made me feel like the reason the doors or curtain like walls (unclear)
were there because the buildings had something to hide. Although the buildings
were gray, orange, and green and did not look very official, they could
represent some kind of corporate building or other administration that
have certain secrets they don't want revealed whether it be to the public
or whom ever (grammar error). I'm sure everyone
got their own interpretations from the pieces but for a while I did not
know what to think of this vividly colorful set of buildings. If a title
was included I would have been able to see more of what the artist was
thinking or feeling but then again he may have just wanted the viewers
to form their own impressions.
Why is this a non-example?
-The author identified the where and when of the
exhibition, but did not describe the purpose
of the exhibit. The topic, theme or kind of show it was
is not conveyed.
-This single piece of work is not described in terms
of its elements,
principles,
kind,
historically, socially,
or culturally
-The author did not describe his own perceptions and feelings
of the work
-Overall, the author tended to demonstrate what he
didn't know about the piece rather than what
he did know.
Non-example #2
"San Diego Museum of Photographic Art"
On October 24th I visited the Museum of Photographic Art. Entitled "under
the Dark Cloth" the exhibition concerned the view camera in contemporary
photography. A view camera represents a technology developed in the nineteenth
century that a number of contemporary photographers use to record those
scenes and depictions in a manner termed artistic. To establish that the
view camera requires a deep and abiding commitment on the part of the photographer/artist,
consider what the exhibition introduction quotes from Robert Adams' The
American space: Meaning in 19th century Landscape Photography (1983): "One
does not for long wrestle a view camera in the wind and heat and cold just
to illustrae a philosophy. The thing that keeps you scramblling over the
rocks, risking snakes, and swatting at flies is the view. It is only your
enjoyment of and commitment to what you see, not to what you rationally
understand, that balances the otherwise absurd investment of labor."
(goes off the topic of the exhibition
here, this is a digression)
James Fee (b. 1949) uses a view camera. He states that the past is very
much part of his work, even to the point that he employs an old technology
to render his scenes. In his series from 1994-96, Fee uses toned gelatin
silver prints to record images of bygone industrial America with its cast-off
objects and failed systems. Fee aims to present us with various symbols
of abandonment and decay.
In 1995, Fee photographed the ruins of the oldest prison in the US at
an abandoned site known as the Eastern State Penitentiary. This prison
opened in 1829 and incorporated Jeremy Bentha's panopticon design so effectively
criticized by Michel Foucault in his book Discipline and Punish. (doesn't show the relationship of criticism to the prison
to the art) Fee recorded 8' x 12' cells, each illuminated by a skylight
and equipped with a work station to occupy the prisoners. His work evokes
the lonely world of each past occupant who one can imagine confined to
such a circumscribed space.
Why is this a non-example?
-The author describes the exhibition well, but
digresses to the philosophy behind the tool
instead of focusing on the theme of the exhibition
-In the last paragraph, the author appears to begin
describing the elements and principles,but refers to a criticism of the prison instead of presenting
further information on the work of art.
-There is no information about the author's personal reaction to the work
REFLECT: Avoid the Including the Features
Noted in these Non-Examples
Does it have
the features of these examples?
Avoid including the features in these non-examples: Non-example
1, Non-example 2
How well did you compose your
report?
-
Introduction |
Art Basics | The Visit
| The Report | Extend